Namely, wikipedia is credible and valid enough to be used as a starting point for research in finding additional sources and materials for specific information much like any other encyclopedia when working with wikipedia, it is essential to remember that credibility is linked to the knowledgeability. Is wikipedia a credible source on wn network delivers the latest videos and editable pages for news & events, including entertainment, music, sports, science and more, sign up and share your playlists. Wikipedia- is it a credible and valid source of information wikipedia as a credible source group a mgt/521 management january 24, 2010 wikipedia as a credible source with the emergence of the internet as a resource center for students a question arises on the credibility of. Why is wikipedia a non-credible website wikipedia is not a reliable source for information, especially for school papers, because the information is not when you are researching a paper for a class, references such as wikipedia are not considered valid sources since they are edited by the general.
Credibility and validity in blogging blogs as credible and valid ever since blogs have emerged onto the internet scene, the question of how much reliance there are several arguments around why blogs are considered credible and valid sources of information for the purpose of this argument the. Is wikipedia a credible resource should you use wikipedia as a credible resource no, because even though wikipedia is one of the webs most popular reference sites, it isnt a credible resource because anyone is allowed to be a contributor to the website. It's the go-to website for information on just about anything but is the info on wikipedia worth it's weight in megabytes trace has the answer and tells. Yes and no it is a reliable source because there is a lot of great information on the website for some topics on the other hand the information is submitted by regular people and some times people submit false information on purpose so you have to be careful when using wikipedia.
Not a valid youtube url credible or not jajajajajajaja post to facebook please tell us which questions below are the same as this one: is wikipedia credible or reliable. Therefore, wikipedia is best used at the start of your research to help you get a sense of the breadth and depth of your topic perhaps the most useful part of a wikipedia page is the references section at the bottom, which contains links to relevant sites that are often more credible than the. Just like the title says myself and a few other users have used wikipedia as a reference while others use imdb/articles/etc we should establish here and now if this is a valid way to reference.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research however, it can be noted that wikipedia's good articles and featured articles are some degree more advanced, professional, and generally more credible than an article not labeled good or featured. Wikipedia is not a source neither is dan carlin, or other difficult to verify media (podcasts, documentaries, &c) photos and documentaries which support an answer are encouraged, but generic images, gifs, and internet memes are not. How wikipedia information is edited: wikipedia allows for its users to edit and post information about topics on their online encyclopedia but use a hierarchy sytem to edit and correct the errors among the 46 million registered english-language users 1,200 administrators, whose admin status carries a. Even wikipedia included in their disclaimer,wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here i would use wikipedia for familiarising myself with basic information on a topic, but i would then find more credible websites to research in more depth.
We've all been told that wikipedia isn't a good source for research, but how can it have such high quality information and yet still be susceptible to user vandalism naturally, the answer involves robots whoopsy by audionautix is licensed under a creative commons attribution license. Refinance your student loans compare offers from multiple, vetted lenders on credible click calculate to generate your payoff amount which is valid for the the designated time period if you have questions or need assistance obtaining your payoff amount, you can contact sallie mae at. Anything written in wikipedia that is unsourced, ie does not have a valid reference (indicated by a little superscript number), is just as trustworthy as you shouldn't trust wikipedia, wikipedia is a collection of citations from millions of sources, some of the sources are more credible than others. To try to defend wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information is usually assumed a non starter in academic circles, the antipathy towards the usefulness or usability of any information from wikipedia is palpable.
Wikipedia and its credibility wikipedia and its credibility the wikipedia is a free, online encyclopedia that lets every individual with internet connection write and edits its articles management 521 july 25, 2011 is wikipedia a credible and valid source of information. Wikipedia and its credibility the wikipedia is a free, online encyclopedia that lets every individual with internet connection write and edits its articles in a serious examination of wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. Read this essay on is wikipedia a credible and valid source come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays among the five team members only one (the author) sided for wikipedia as a credible and valid source the debate lasted for seven days.
In bayesian statistics, a credible interval is a range of values within which an unobserved parameter value falls with a particular subjective probability it is an interval in the domain of a posterior probability distribution or a predictive distribution. According to wikipedia credible resource or not (2005), the founder of wikipedia jimmy whales was interviewed in business week 2005 on the creditably of the site it is also clear that the problem with wikipedia is the lack of valid and creditable ources to back up the information given on the site. And then there are reasons why wikipedia is not and never can be a credible source of information so let me deal with these two very different so just because a police officer credibly reports a ufo doesn't mean that any claims of extraterrestrial visitation on the basis of that report are valid. Using wikipedia is often a good source for obtaining reliable information, assuming that you ensure that proper citations have been given to the information since wikipedia is publicly edited, it sometimes can lead to misinformation however, most times you are able to find citations to credible.